Legal Opinion

People v. Marsicano

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1943No. Civ. 2977PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

This is a proceeding in eminent domain brought by respondent for the purpose of condemning a claimed interest in the land of appellant. In 1928 respondent, with the view to widening, at some future time, the highway known as Foothill Boulevard, in the town of Cucamonga, in San Bernardino County, sought to acquire a 20-foot strip of land on each side of its highway. Appellant owned the southwest corner property (208 feet by 179 feet) fronting on Foothill Boulevard, at Archibald Avenue. At that time a service station was located near the corner on a part of the property. On a larger part of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lemm v. Stillwater Land & Cattle Co.California Supreme Court · 1933
  2. City of Manhattan Beach v. CortelyouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Wilson v. MatteiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Gardner v. San Gabriel Valley BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. Chambers v. FarnhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tobin Quarries, Inc. v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation Dist.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1946
  2. Ott Hardware Co. v. YostCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Snyders v. HaleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API