Legal Opinion

Wells v. Van Nort

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1919No. 16034PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Myrtle Van Nort sued the plaintiff in error, J. H. Wells,'in'the court of common pleas, alleging that she had employed him as a surgeon to perform an operation for appendicitis, and that such surgeon, in addition to removing the appendix, removed both fallopian tubes of the plaintiff without her knowledge or consent.

Defendant answered, admitting that he performed the surgical operation on the plaintiff, but denied every other allegation contained in the petition.

On the trial, plaintiff having introduced her evidence and rested her case, a motion of the defendant to arrest the…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Daniel Howard Bee v. Dr. Keith Greaves, Medic Keith Hughes and Dr. Robert GreerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  2. Davis v. HubbardDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
  3. Estate of Leach v. ShapiroOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Peters v. B. & F. Transfer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Dicenzo v. BergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API