Legal Opinion

Kimball-Mathews Co. v. Nagel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 16, 1921No. 6623PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from District Court, Bexar County; Robert W. B. Terrell, Judge. Action by the Kimball-Mathews Company against F. E. Nagel. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

E. E. Nagel, operating a photographic studio in San Antonio, gave the Kimball-Mathews Company a written order, in the form of a contract executed by both parties, for certain stationery supplies, at agreed prices, aggregating $3,552.75, to be delivered from time to time f. o. b. cars at Columbus, Ohio, where the company wag engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling photographic supplies. The supplies in question, which were to consist of folders for use in incasing photographs, were to be specially manufactured for Nagel, and embossed with the latter’s trade-name and address. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Belcher v. Mulhall & ScalingTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Murray Co. v. PutmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Barnes v. Early-Foster Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Bruck Bros. v. Lipman, Speir HahnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Ohio Pottery & Glass Co. v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Block v. Tarrant Wholesale Drug Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API