Legal Opinion

Murray Co. v. Putman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 10, 1910PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Navarro County. Tried below before Hon. H. B. Daviss.

1Opinion of the Court

RAINEY, Chief Justice.

— On July 15, 1907, C. A. Putman of Dawson, Navarro County, Texas, purchased some gin machinery from The Murray Company of Dallas, Texas, giving a written order therefor, which machinery was to be shipped on or about July 25, 1907. Said order contained, among others, the following stipulation, to wit: “Said machine is warranted to be good material, to perform well, if properly operated by competent persons. Upon starting, if the purchasers at any time within ten days are unable to make same operate well, telegraph or written notice, stating wherein it fails to conform to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. HawkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Belcher v. Mulhall & ScalingTexas Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harvey v. ElderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  2. Feeney & Bremer Co. v. StoneOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. J. B. Colt Co. v. McBurnettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Independent Shope Brick Co. v. DuggerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Shary v. HelmickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API