Legal Opinion

In Re the Arbitration Between Perkins & Will Partnership & Syska and Hennessy

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1977PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The agreements between the architect and the structural engineers and mechanical engineers respectively did not contain a "broad arbitration clause” calling for the arbitration of all disputes. Quite to the contrary, Paragraph 15 of each agreement specifically covered disputes of the type presently at issue by providing that "[a]ny decision or determination resulting from arbitration between the Architect and the Owner which relates to the Consultant’s services [referring to either the structural or mechanical engineers] shall…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Nationwide General Insurance v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re the Arbitration Between John W. Cowper Co. & Hires-Turner Glass Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. SCAC Transport (USA) Inc. v. S.S. "Danaos"District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  3. In re the Arbitration between County of Rensselaer & Rensselaer County UnitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. Larroca v. Royal Associates, L. L. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. In re Perkins & Will PartnershipNew York Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API