Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Tennille Banking Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 16, 1973No. 27782PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jordan, Justice.

We must reverse. Georgia has adopted the rule that where there is an interest and a power existing together in the same person or persons over property and there is a conveyance without express or implied reference to the power, such conveyance attaches only to the interest and not the power. This subject matter was fully discussed by Chief Justice Bleckley in Terry v. Rodahan, 79 Ga. 278 (5 SE 38, 11 ASR 420), and later by this court in Mahoney v. Manning, 133 Ga. 784 (66 SE 1082). From the discussion in these cases and the holding in Holder v. American Investment &c. Co., 94…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Terry v. RodahanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  2. Mahoney v. ManningSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Mayo v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Cannon v. LaingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  5. Mathis v. GlawsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McKinnon v. TrivettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. Lewis v. WillifordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. Atlanta-East, Inc. v. LairdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  4. Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. v. AtwoodCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API