Legal Opinion · Dissent

Atlanta-East, Inc. v. Laird

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 1, 1998No. S98A0240Published

1DissentCarley, Justice

In my opinion, the majority fails to apply controlling precedent which distinguishes between the authority of the Bank to convey an interest in property and the Bank’s actual conveyance of an interest pursuant to the exercise of its authority. The 1942 deed of trust clearly authorized the Bank to sell the one-fourth interest in the property which it received as trustee of the McCorkle estate. However, in executing the 1983 deed, the Bank acted only in its capacity as trustee of the Porter estate. Thus, the Bank did not purport to convey the undivided one-fourth interest which it held as a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Terry v. RodahanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  2. Clarke v. East Atlanta Land Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Penta v. Concord Auto Auction, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  4. Henderson v. CollinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  5. Mahoney v. ManningSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API