Carr v. Scott
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Plaintiff assigns as error the trial court’s allowance of defendants’ motion for a directed verdict. We think the motion was properly allowed on the ground of plaintiff’s contributory negligence as a matter of law.
In Bledsoe v. Gaddy, 10 N.C. App. 470, 472, 179 S.E. 2d 167, 169 (1971), the test for determining whether a directed verdict should be allowed on the basis of contributory negligence is stated:
“A directed verdict on the ground of contributory negligence will be allowed only when plaintiff’s evidence, taken in the light most favorable to him, so clearly establishes…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dreher v. . DivineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Galloway v. HartmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Anderson v. MannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Bledsoe v. GaddyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971