Wolfe v. Eaker
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
At the close of plaintiffs’ evidence the trial judge entered a directed verdict because the plaintiffs had produced no evidence of any of the allegations upon which they sought to establish their claim. The directed verdict against the plaintiffs on their claim was proper. Plaintiffs neither object, except nor assign error to the directed verdict against them on their claim, but instead argue alleged errors in directing the verdict on defendants’ counterclaim. We hold that on the unique facts of this case the directed verdict for the defendants on the plaintiffs’ claim required…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- North Carolina National Bank v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Mills v. BoninSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Estate of Balkus v. Security First National Bank of Sheboygan Trust DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- Mid-America Real Estate & Investment Corp. v. LundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re the Foreclosure of the Deed of Trust of OwenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Southwest Development Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1992
- Pitts v. BroyhillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.