James v. Miller

Opinion op the Court by

Chiep Justice Ratliff

Affirming.

This appeal involves the question of whether or not Drusie James, a person of unsound mind, was properly served with summons in an action brought in the Jefferson circuit court in which she was named a party defendant.

The appellees, who were the plaintiffs below, filed their petition in equity in which they alleged that they were the owners of an undivided seven-tenths interest in a certain tract of land in Jefferson county, and that Ruth Carr was owner of one-tenth interest, and Drusie James the owner of two-tenths interest. The…