Legal Opinion

Barry v. Fain's Administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 21, 1916PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Payette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

Reversing.

A suit was brought by the administrator and widow of Nathan Fain against the heirs of Nathan Fain for the purpose of settling his estate, and to sell real estate to pay the debts of the decedent, and divide whatever surplus from the sale of the real estate that might be left among persons entitled thereto. Elmo and Leo Fain, infants under the age of fourteen years, who had an interest in the real estate, and William Gordon Fain, a person of unsound mind, who also had an interest in the real estate, were made defendants .in the suit.

The petition…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Elliott v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  2. Clay's Guardian v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Hulsewede v. Churchman's Extx.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ramsey's v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Adams v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  3. Davenport v. Jenkins' CommitteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  4. Hurm v. CollignonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  5. Noe v. BengeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API