Legal Opinion

State v. Carsetti

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 3, 1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLASSMAN, Justice.

Defendant Emil Carsetti appeals from a judgment entered by the Superior Court, Cumberland County, on a jury verdict finding him guilty of burglary, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 401(2)(B) (1983), and theft, 17-A M.R.S. A. § 353 (1983). On appeal Carsetti contends that 1) the court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence, 2) the jury was improperly instructed and 3) the evidence was insufficient to establish the stolen property had a value in excess of $5,000. We affirm the judgment.

I

Carsetti first contends that because the police officer had no reasonable articu-lable suspicion…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  3. State v. ThurlowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  4. State v. CyrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  5. State v. ThibeaultSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  2. Emil Carsetti v. State of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. State v. HillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  5. State of Maine v. Claudia G. VilesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API