Legal Opinion
Holtz v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 9, 1992No. Civ. 910242PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
Carol Holtz appeals from a district court judgment affirming the Workers’ Compensation Bureau’s order denying her disability and vocational rehabilitation benefits. We affirm.
Holtz left her employment at a beauty shop in August of 1989 because she contracted dermatitis. She was granted temporary total disability benefits which were to be discontinued in early September. See NDCC §§ 65-01-02(12)(b) and 65-05-09. However, Holtz remained unemployed and asked the Bureau for assistance in finding employment. See NDCC § 65-05.1-01(7)(b). She was given a vocational assessment from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Newland v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Claim of BromleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Holmgren v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Satrom v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Westman v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. KinseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Tooley v. AlmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Zuger v. North Dakota Insurance Guaranty Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Effertz v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Svedberg v. NORTH DAKOTA WORKERS COMPENSATION BUREAUNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.