Legal Opinion

Spivak v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 1, 1953No. 10936_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLaughlin, circuit judge.

This libel which involves a claim for salvage services was dismissed on respondent’s motion by the district judge at the trial below and libellant appeals.

In August, 1947, libellant was a civilian employee of the United States War Department. His original written contract of hire as master 1 was with the United States of America and dated at New Orleans October 25, 1945. By the agreement his base pay was fixed at $6,0.36 per annum. That same day he was transferred to the Pacific Theatre of Operations. According to Spivak he signed another employment contract at San…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Clarita and the ClaraSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Burke v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  3. Kovell v. Portland Tug & Barge Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Markakis v. S/S VOLENDAMDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  2. Kimes v. United States the William M. MeredithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  3. Nolan v. A. H. Basse Rederi Aktieselskab & Pennsylvania Salt Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Anepac, Ltd. v. Barge "Great Sound"District Court, Virgin Islands · 1975
  5. Manley v. NicodemisenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API