Legal Opinion

Dunphy v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 21, 1906PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

The plaintiff was struck and knocked off the track by a passing train while working in the defendant’s employment on the loop at the Dudley Street terminal station of the defendant’s railway in Boston, and this is an action to recover for the injuries thereby received. The declaration contained five counts, the first being at common law and the others under the employers’ liability act. The second count was for injuries caused by negligence on the part of a person entrusted with and exercising superintendence, whose sole or principal duty was that of superintendence. The case was submitted to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  2. Scullane v. KelloggMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  3. Lynch v. M. T. Stevens & Sons Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  4. Greenstein v. ChickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Santore v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Sleeper v. ParkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  3. Carney v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Keating v. HewattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  5. Heaney v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API