Stresscon Corp. v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JUDGE BERNARD
1 Along with other issues, the defendant, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America (the insurance company), raises a question in this appeal concerning "no voluntary payment" clauses. These clauses appear in many insurance policies, They prohibit insureds from voluntarily settling claims and making payment, or from assuming cer- ° tain expenses, without the insurer's consent, at the risk of losing insurance benefits.
{2 The question we must resolve in this appeal is whether an insured's breach of a "no voluntary payment" clause will always bar the insured from…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Hernandez v. Gulf Group LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Compass Insurance Co. v. City of LittletonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Vaccaro v. American Family Insurance GroupColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Gurule v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Monell v. Cherokee River, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. ReiherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017