Legal Opinion

Stresscon Corp. v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 12, 2013No. Court of Appeals Nos. 11CA1239 & 11CA1582PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JUDGE BERNARD

1 Along with other issues, the defendant, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America (the insurance company), raises a question in this appeal concerning "no voluntary payment" clauses. These clauses appear in many insurance policies, They prohibit insureds from voluntarily settling claims and making payment, or from assuming cer- ° tain expenses, without the insurer's consent, at the risk of losing insurance benefits.

{2 The question we must resolve in this appeal is whether an insured's breach of a "no voluntary payment" clause will always bar the insured from…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Hernandez v. Gulf Group LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Compass Insurance Co. v. City of LittletonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. Vaccaro v. American Family Insurance GroupColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Gurule v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Monell v. Cherokee River, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. State v. ReiherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API