Legal Opinion
Mimick Motor Co. v. Moore
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 27, 2001No. A01A0182PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Eldridge, Judge.
Appellee-plaintiff Willie Moore brought a complaint in trover against appellant-defendant Mimick Motor Company (“Mimick”), a Nebraska car dealership, alleging that Mimick had wrongfully repossessed a 1996 Taurus he purchased from Savannah Auto Brokers, Inc. (“Savannah Auto”) d/b/a Payless Rent-a-Car (“Payless”). Moore sought actual and punitive damages or, in lieu of punitive damages, the return of the vehicle with judgment for hire or profits. By amendment to his complaint, Moore added a claim under the Fair Business Practices Act. Mimick later moved to join Savannah Auto…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Pickett v. PaineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Zampatti v. Tradebank International Franchising Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Hightower v. BerlinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- State of Ga. v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- HWA Properties, Inc. v. Community & Southern BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Johnson v. First Union National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Kirkland v. Earth Fare, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Gwinnett Community Bank v. Arlington Capital, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Mitchell Motors, Inc. v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.