Legal Opinion

Magno v. Dept. of Rev.

Oregon Tax Court

Decided May 18, 2006No. TC 4720PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I. INTRODUCTION

This case comes before the court for decision after trial. Plaintiff (taxpayer) appeals from a Magistrate Decision finding that, for the 2003-04 tax year, the real market value (RMV) of certain residential property owned by taxpayer was $933,000 and the maximum assessed value (MAV) and assessed value (AV) of the property was $893,630. Taxpayer maintains that the actual RMV of the property was not more than $700,000, and, alternatively, that the AV of the property should not have exceeded $800,600. Defendant (the department) and Intervenor (the county) ask the court to find that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allen v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2003
  2. Chart Development Corporation v. Department, RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2001
  3. Astoria Plywood Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1975
  4. Chart Development Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2003
  5. Hoxie v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2001

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Alberts Development v. Lane County, Tc-Md 100522 (or.tax 12-12-2011)Oregon Tax Court · 2011
  2. Banducci v. Douglas County Assessor, Tc-Md 090069c (or.tax 9-23-2010)Oregon Tax Court · 2010
  3. Blatner v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 080472c (or.tax 2-3-2009)Oregon Tax Court · 2009
  4. Clackamas County Assessor v. Poppert, Tc-Md 100374b (or.tax 8-12-2011)Oregon Tax Court · 2011
  5. Florence Designs v. Multnomah Cnty. Asses., Tc-Md 100663b (or.tax 2-24-2011)Oregon Tax Court · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API