In Re Burns
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HATFIELD, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the primary examiner requiring division, in appellant's application for a patent, of certain claims directed to a product, that is, a package, claims 9, 10, 15, and 16, from other claims directed to a machine, claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 11, and 12, and those directed to a process for making the product, claims 5, 6, 7, 8, 13, and 14.
Claims 1, machine, 5, process, and 9, product, are illustrative. They read:
“(1) In a wrapping machine, the combination with a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re FerenciCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
- In re FerenciCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- In Re PattonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- In Re FerenciCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
- Application of John P. Swentzel (The Carborundum Co., Assignee)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- In re WaltersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.