State v. Samsa

¶ 1. Jordan Samsa appeals a judgment of conviction for third-degree sexual assault and an order denying his postconviction motion. Samsa seeks resentencing or, alternatively, sentence modification. He argues that the circuit court erroneously interpreted and applied the criminogenic-needs portion of a COMPAS assessment and that accurate information concerning COMPAS constitutes a new factor for sentencing purposes.1 We reject Samsa's arguments and affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2. According to the criminal complaint, A.N., then fourteen years old, reported she had been sexually assaulted by Samsa. Samsa…