Legal Opinion

State v. Rush

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant Karl Nathan Rush entered a plea of not guilty in the District Court for Lane County for the crime of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The district court found him guilty and he appealed his conviction to the Circuit Court of Lane County. Before trial in the circuit court, defendant filed a motion in the circuit court to set aside the complaint for the reason that it failed to conform to the statutory requirements for traffic complaints. The motion was denied. The same motion was renewed at the time of trial and again denied. Defendant waived a jury, was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WaggonerOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Byers v. FergusonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Higgins v. FieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Credit Service Co. v. StierlyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. MarcilionisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API