Cruse v. Cruse
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtDe Geaff, C. J.
An action for separate maintenance must be supported with that quantum of evidence which warrants a decree of divorce. Shors v. Shors, 133 Iowa 24; Shipley v. Shipley, 187 Iowa 1295. The instant plaintiff: alleges cruel and inhuman treatment. Since this appeal presents fact questions only, prior decisions are of little value in solving the problem before us.
Two factors in that problem may be considered. Was the conduct of the defendant cruel and inhuman, within the legal concept of that term? Did the conduct of the defendant endanger the health or life of the plaintiff? The trial court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shors v. ShorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Shipley v. ShipleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Dabelstein v. DabelsteinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
3Cited by10 opinions
- Coulter v. CoulterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Roach v. RoachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Freet v. HoldorfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Schneckloth v. SchnecklothSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.