Schneckloth v. Schneckloth

—Helena Schneckloth, the plaintiff-appellee, relies upon inhuman treatment as the ground for obtaining a divorce from her husband, Peter J. Schneckloth, the defendant-appellant. Upon that basis the decree was entered by the district court. A reversal is asked by the appellant because: First, appellee’s evidence does not show inhuman treatment; second, assuming that it does, there was condonation; and, third, the alimony is excessive. These complaints will now be considered in the order named.

I. Section 10475 of the 1927 Code provides:

“Divorces from the bonds of matrimony may be decreed…