Legal Opinion

Maryland Attorney General Opinion 96 OAG 093

Maryland Attorney General Reports

Decided November 16, 2011No. 96 OAG 093Published

1Opinion of the Court

Gen. 93] 93 COUNTIES CODE REVISION – WHETHER REPEAL OF STATUTORY PROVISIONS ALLOWING CITIZENS TO APPEAL COUNTY BRIDGE WORK DECISIONS WOULD EFFECT A SUBSTANTIVE CHANGE IN THE LAW November 16, 2011 Kelly G. Dincau Department of Legislative Services Office of Policy Analysis In connection with the ongoing code revision process, you have requested our opinion whether Article 25, §§46 and 47 of the Annotated Code of Maryland, which grant citizens the right to appeal a decision of county commissioners to build or repair a bridge, may be repealed without effecting a substantive change in the law.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Lockshin v. SemskerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Department of Natural Resources v. Linchester Sand & Gravel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Schisler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Koshko v. HainingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. State Department of Health v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API