United States v. Ashton
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MARSH, District Judge.
James A. Ashton, a practicing attorney in Allegheny County, was convicted by a jury of two counts of mail fraud. He filed a “Motion for Arrest of Judgment” and a “Motion for a New Trial.” In our opinion both motions should be denied.
The reason assigned in support of the motion for arrest of judgment states: “The indictment does not charge an offense against the United States under the applicable interpretation of the law.” This reason was not supported by argument or authority. It is our opinion that each of the eight counts in the indictment adequately…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Elliott Kahaner, Antonio Corallo and James Vincent KeoghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Peter W. WeberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Charles Tourine Et Ano., and Leonard Burtman and Benedict HimmelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Harvey Ray HatcherCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Commonwealth v. SpiegelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. CahalaneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- United States v. CahalaneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- United States v. AshtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975