Legal Opinion
Arangesan Suntharalinkam v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 18, 2006No. 04-70258Published
1Opinion of the Court
458 F.3d 1034
Arangesan SUNTHARALINKAM, Petitioner,
v.
Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 04-70258.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted March 10, 2006.
Filed August 18, 2006.
Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran, Law Office of Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran, New York, NY, for the petitioner.
Genevieve Holm (argued) and Cynthia Stone (briefed), U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Division, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for the respondent. Also on brief for the respondent, Lester M. Joseph and Michael E. Davitt, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Criminal Division,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Baltazar Hernandez Barron Margarita Hernandez Ramirez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Gerardo Bibiano Falcon Carriche Theresa v. De Falcon Carriche and Christina Pamela Falcon Bibiano v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Gurmeet Singh Malhi, AKA Parpal Singh Malli Davinder Singh v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Chun He Li v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.