Legal Opinion
Dickins v. Beal
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 26, 1836PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
35 U.S. 451 (____)
10 Pet. 451
*SAMUEL DICKINS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
WILLIAM M. BEAL.
Supreme Court of United States.
This case was submitted to the court, without argument, by Mr. Porter and Mr. Crittenden.
2Opinion of the Court · BaldwinJustice Baldwin
Samuel Dickins, the defendant, and Jesse Taylor, were partners, transacting business at Hazelwood, Madison county, Tennessee, which was the residence of Dickins. On the 6th of December, 1832, Taylor drew a bill of exchange for 1448 dollars, on Wilcox and Feron, New Orleans, in favour of Dickins, payable on the 1st of May, 1834, which Dickins endorsed to the plaintiff. On the same day Dickins…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Renner v. Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Nicholls v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Chirac v. Lessee of ChiracSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
- Bank of Columbia Ex Rel. Bank of United States v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Williams v. Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- Dawson v. LitseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
- McCormick v. FitzmorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
- Ex parte Selma & Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1871
- Hammond v. St. Louis Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1843
- Bybee v. AshbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1845
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.