Whitfield v. State

FOSTER, ■ J.

The defendant, appellant, was • convicted of manufacturing prohibited liquors.

The evidence for the state was directed to showing that the defendant and one Will. Smoot wore found at a still containing beer used for making whisky; there was fire under the furnace; the still had' been run before ; there were about 300 or 400 gallons of beer there of the kind used in making whisky; the whisky was about ready to run from the still; that defendant was in about 10 steps of the still cutting wood of the same kind that was burning finder the furnace; that Will Smoot was putting the cap on…