Legal Opinion

Mann v. Corrington

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 18, 1894PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Polk District Court. — Hon. Stephen F Balliet, Judge. Action a.t law for the recovery of damages alleged to' have been sustained by reason of a breach of contract on the part of the defendant. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

On the thirty-first day of August, 1891, the plaintiff conveyed to the defendant and his wife four lots in Mann’s First addition to Oak Park, and received in payment a mortgage on the lots for five hundred dollars, and a conveyance of property in the town of Nevada, which the grantors then occupied as a homestead. After the transaction was closed, the defendant visited Des Moines, and, while there, signed an instrument in writing, of which the following is a copy: “Des Moines, Iowa, Oct. 14, 1891. This memorandum will witness that L. M. Mann agrees to convey *109to Benton Corrington, by a good…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Christy v. DyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863
  2. First National Bank v. HollinsworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  3. Cowgell v. WarringtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  4. Benham v. Chamberlain & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  5. State v. GeddisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Orange Brevard Plumbing & Heating Co. v. La CroixSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  2. Robinson v. CharletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  3. Fardal v. SatreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. Maguire v. HansonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. Elliott v. TillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API