Legal Opinion

Hotlen v. Middour

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 1961No. Appeal, 301PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

Defendant took this appeal from an Order of the Court below dismissing his Preliminary Objections which were in the nature of a motion to set aside service of a Writ of Summons in Assumpsit made upon defendant in Philadelphia County. The relevant facts which appeared from the depositions may be summarized as follows:

Defendant, G. Charles Middour, trading as G. C. Middour Co., is a manufacturer of aluminum storm windows and doors. His factory and principal place of business is in Waynesboro, Franklin County, Pennsylvania. Defendant does no business in Philadelphia…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eastburn v. TurnoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Fitelson v. Acuff, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1958
  3. Lloyd v. Thomas, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1947

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Henkel Corp. v. DegremontDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Keane v. McGeadyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Darling v. Tel Ra Productions, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1972
  4. Durant v. Durant, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1980
  5. Hugues v. Boyer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API