Legal Opinion
Dorbest Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 3, 2011No. Slip Op. 11-95; Court 05-00003PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Chief Judge:
This matter concerns the selection of “surrogate” countries as a source for data with which to calculate the labor wage rate in an antidumping investigation involving wooden bedroom furniture from China, a non-market economy (“NME”). The case now returns to the court after the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) redetermination, Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Remand, (Apr. 27, 2011) {“2011 Redetermination ”), following a partial remand order in Dorbest Ltd. v. United States, — CIT -, 755 F.Supp.2d 1291 (CIT 2011) (“Dorbest V”). 1
Plaintiff/Respondent,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Dorbest Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Grobest & I-Mei Industrial (Vietnam) Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Dongguan Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Fresh Garlic Producers Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Jinxiang Yuanxin Import & Export Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013