Legal Opinion

Brave Optical Inc. v. Luxottica of America Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided February 11, 2026No. 1:23-cv-00793Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION BRAVE OPTICAL INC.,1 Plaintiff, Case No. 1:23-cv-793 v. JUDGE DOUGLAS R. COLE LUXOTTICA OF AMERICA INC., Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER On March 31, 2025, the Court issued an Opinion and Order (Doc. 39) granting Defendant Luxottica of America Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 19). In that Opinion,2 the Court found: (1) Plaintiffs’ Sherman Act claims are time-barred, (Doc. 39, #1001– 09); (2) the breach of contract claims are unsupported by any contractual provisions, (id. at #1009–13); (3) Ohio state law does not apply to this…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Directv, Inc. And Echostar Satellite L.L.C. v. Mark Treesh, Commissioner for the Department of Revenue for the State of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Intera Corporation v. George Henderson IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API