Stern v. Judson
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Haas, Garrett & Dunnigan, and Haas & Dunnigan, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
On June 29, 1904, the appellant, Judson, commenced an action entitled W. B. Judson v. C. S. Patrick et al., against this plaintiff and seventeen other parties to quiet his alleged title to various pare'Is of lard in Los Angeles County, including lots fifteen and sixteen of the New York Tract, averring in his complaint that he was the owner in fee thereof and that defendants had no estate or interest therein. Service of summons was by publication, the order of the court therefor being based on the verified complaint in said action and an affidavit of plaintiff made and fi'ed therein in which…
2Cited by25 opinions
- Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Donel, Inc. v. BadalianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Watts v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Kott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Mundo v. FústerSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.