Legal Opinion
Taylor v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided September 16, 2011No. A-10244PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
Lonnie D. Taylor appeals his conviction for second-degree theft (theft of property valued at $500 or more). 1 In our previous decision in this case, Taylor v. State, Alaska App. Memorandum Opinion No. 5648 (September 22, 2010), 2010 WL 8719523, we concluded that the evidence presented at Taylor's trial was legally sufficient to support a finding that the stolen property (a specialty bicycle) was worth at least $500. However, we remanded Taylor's case to the superior court for reconsideration of Taylor's claim that, even though the evidence was minimally sufficient to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Carluin SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States of America, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Gregory Ferguson, AKA "Black Greggo," Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Dorman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re Petition for Writ of ProhibitionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- State v. HinchliffeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hunter v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Korakanh Phornsavanh v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2021
- White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2013
- Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019
- Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.