Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Morphe, LLC.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 7, 2022No. 2:20-cv-01219Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Valerie Brooks, No. 2:20-cv-01219-KJM-DB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. Morphe LLC, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 Valerie Brooks, who is legally blind, brought this action on behalf of a proposed class of 18 | visually impaired internet users. She alleges Morphe LLC operates a website that is not 19 | accessible to the visually impaired, and she moves now to certify the proposed class. Because she 20 | has not shown the class is “so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable,” Fed. R. 21 | Civ. P.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Ellis v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Benjamin Berger v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API