Oakley v. United Finance Corp.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matchett
In an action to recover the value of certain shares of stock in the Aetna Acceptance Company of the par value of $7,600 and upon trial by jury, the court, at the close of all the evidence, denied a motion of the defendant to instruct in its favor and granted the motion of plaintiff for an instructed verdict in the sum of $9,365, overruled the motion of defendant for a new trial, and entered judgment on the verdict. The defendant has appealed.
The action was based upon two sections of two statutes: First, section 28 of the General Corporation Act of 1919 as amended (Cahill’s Ill. St. 1931, ch.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stewart v. BradyIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
- South Carolina v. GaillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Vance v. RankinIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- Ware v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
- Ahlenius v. Bunn & Humphreys, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Central Republic Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1939