Legal Opinion

Oakley v. United Finance Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 10, 1938No. Gen. No. 39,647PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matchett

In an action to recover the value of certain shares of stock in the Aetna Acceptance Company of the par value of $7,600 and upon trial by jury, the court, at the close of all the evidence, denied a motion of the defendant to instruct in its favor and granted the motion of plaintiff for an instructed verdict in the sum of $9,365, overruled the motion of defendant for a new trial, and entered judgment on the verdict. The defendant has appealed.

The action was based upon two sections of two statutes: First, section 28 of the General Corporation Act of 1919 as amended (Cahill’s Ill. St. 1931, ch.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stewart v. BradyIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  2. South Carolina v. GaillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Vance v. RankinIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Ware v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Ahlenius v. Bunn & Humphreys, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Central Republic Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API