Legal Opinion
Finkelstein v. Barthelemy
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided February 8, 1988No. Civ. A. 87-0669PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
CHARLES SCHWARTZ, Jr., District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on motion of defendants Sidney Barthelemy and Okla Jones for summary judgment and on motion of defendant City of New Orleans to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action. 1 By minute entry of January 29, 1988, the Court granted both motions. This Order and Reasons explains the Court’s reasons for its ruling.
Few have been Talleyrands; fewer should think they could be. Today, this Court considers whether the Mayor of New Orleans and his City Attorney may demand absolute loyalty of the Assistant City…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Stott v. HaworthCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Esly B. Williams v. City of River Rouge, Daniel Cooney, Michael Bowdler, Danny Stevens, and Charles PratherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Aucoin v. HaneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Goldberg v. Town of Rocky HillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Goldberg v. Town Of Rocky HillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.