Legal Opinion

Iowa Valley State Bank v. Sigstad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1895PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Wright District Court. — Hon. D. E. Hind-man, Judge. Action on a promissory note. Trial to jury as to defendant Bangs. Verdict for plaintiff by direction of the court, and defendant Bangs appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.

I. The petition alleges that the defendants Sigstad executed and delivered to the defendant Bangs their promissory note for two hundred and twenty-five dollars, dated October 23, 1891, ■and due October 23,1892, and drawing eight per cent, interest; that Bangs sold and delivered the note to the Valley Bank, and said Bank sold the same to the plaintiff; that Bangs, when he sold the note, guarantied the payment of the same. Other necessary allegations are made as to the incorporation of plaintiff, that the note is unpaid, etc. The note reads as follows: “$225. Belmond, Iowa, Oct. 23,1891. On or…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rowley v. JewettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  2. Robinson v. LairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  3. Bryant v. LordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
  4. Harrison v. McKimSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  5. Robinson v. ReedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. German American Savings Bank v. HannaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Durband v. NeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  3. Himmelberger v. Central State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. Farmers Savings Bank v. WilkaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. Knapp v. KnappSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API