Legal Opinion
Holder v. Haarmann & Reimer Corp.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 16, 2001No. 00-CV-875PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
David W. Holder appeals from a trial court order dismissing for lack of personal jurisdiction a class action brought by Holder against Haarmann & Reimer Corporation (H & R) under the District’s Antitrust Act of 1980, D.C.Code §§ 28-4501 et seq. (1996 & Supp.2000). On appeal, Holder contends that H & R transacts business in the District and that, contrary to the trial judge’s finding, H & R is therefore amenable to suit in the Superior Court. Holder bases his jurisdictional theory solely on the following asserted contacts between H & R and the District: H & R conspired…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Daley v. Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- FAMILY FEDERATION FOR WORLD PEACE AND UNIFICATION INTERNATIONAL v. HYUN JIN MOONDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Imapizza, LLC v. At Pizza Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Etchebarne-Bourdin v. RadiceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. Fraternal Order of Police/Metropolitan Police Department Labor CommitteeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.