Legal Opinion
Plasterers' Local Union No. 96 Pension Plan v. Perry
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 24, 2010No. Civil PJM 06-338PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETER J. MESSITTE, District Judge.
The Court considers Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney Fees and Expenses [Paper No. 160]. For the following reasons, the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I
Plaintiffs brought suit against Lee Wagner. Sam D. Scholar, Ronald Beddow, Donald Molnar, Harry Perry, James Lertora, and Edgar Pepper, alleging that, while serving as fiduciaries to the Plasterers’ Local Union No. 96 Pension Plan (“Pension Plan” or “Plan”), they violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) and breached then." duties of loyalty, diversification and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Jack Werner v. The Upjohn Company, Inc., a Body Corporate of the State of Delaware, and Ralph J. Carbo, Jr., M.D. And Ralph J. Carbo, Jr., M.D., P.A., a Body Corporate of Maryland, Jack Werner v. Ralph J. Carbo, Jr., M.D., and Ralph J. Carbo, Jr., M.D., P.A., a Body Corporate of Maryland and the Upjohn Company, Inc., a Body Corporate of the State of Delaware, Jack Werner v. Ralph J. Carbo, Jr., M.D. And Ralph J. Carbo, Jr., M.D., P.A., a Body Corporate of Maryland, and the Upjohn Company, Inc., a Body Corporate of the State of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- CoStar Group, Inc. v. LoopNet, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Carolina Care Plan Inc. v. McKenzieCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Narda, Inc. v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust National BankDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Camara v. BlackDiamond Restaurant LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024