Diffenbach v. H. H. Mahler Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.
H. H. Mahler Company, a corporation, sued Nevin J. Diffenbach in the court of common pleas in Tulsa county for a balance due on account and to foreclose a lien. The cause was tried to the court, and a judgment was rendered for plaintiff, and the defendant has appealed. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
It appears that plaintiff company was employed by defendant to perform certain services in the construction of a certain building in Tulsa. It is alleged that the contract was oral, but a letter was introduced detailing the terms of the contract as follows :
“We…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Claffy v. Chicago Dock & Canal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1911
- Sanguinett & Staats v. Colorado Salt Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Schanen-Blair Co. v. Sisters of Charity of the House of ProvidenceWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Albert Steinfeld & Co. v. BroxholmeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
3Cited by6 opinions
- Amarex, Inc. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Edwards v. General Motors Assembly DivisionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
- Stillwater Natlional Bank & Trust Co. v. CookCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- McLaurin v. EtchisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Opinion No. 78-307 (1978) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.