Legal Opinion
United States House of Representatives v. Burwell
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 12, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2014-1967PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge
This Court previously held that the U.S. House of Representatives “has standing to pursue its allegations that the Secretaries of Health and Human Services and of the Treasury violated Article I, § 9, cl. 7 of the Constitution when they spent public monies that were not appropriated by the Congress.” U.S. House of Reps. v. Burwell, 130 F.Supp.3d 53, 81 (D.D.C.2015). The merits of that claim are now before the Court.
This case involves two sections of the Affordable Care Act: 1401 and 1402. Section 1401 provides tax credits to make…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- California v. TrumpDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Sanford Health Plan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Maryland v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Molina Healthcare of California, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Authority of the Department of Health and Human Services to Pay for Private Counsel to Represent an Employee Before Congressional Committees, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.