Legal Opinion

Nashville Railroad v. Howard ex rel. Howard

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Davidson county.— John W. Childress, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister

*111W. A. Howard, as next friend to his minor son, E. M. Howard, recovered a verdict and judgment in the circuit court of Davidson county against the defendant railroad company for the sum of five thousand dollars ($5,000) as damages for injuries to the son. The company appealed, and has assigned errors.

The cause of action, as outlined in the declaration, is that the plaintiff, a minor, four years of age, took passage with his mother and sister on one of defendant’s cars, for the purpose of returning to his home in northeast Nashville; that at the intersection of Meridian and Foster streets, by…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. ArmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Hartfield v. RoperNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  3. Kay v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  4. Carter v. TowneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  5. Koons v. St. Louis & Iron Mountain RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Graham v. CloarCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  2. Winfree v. Coca-Cola Bottling Works of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. EvinsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930
  4. Tubb v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API