Legal Opinion

George v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 21, 2001No. 2D00-4512Published

1Per curiam

Mondrell George challenges the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).

In his motion, George alleged that he was sentenced under an unconstitutional version of the 1995 sentencing guidelines and that the sentence imposed was a departure under the 1994 sentencing guidelines. The trial court summarily denied the motion, and in George v. State, 760 So.2d 293 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), we reversed the order of the trial court and remanded for the trial court to determine whether George committed his offenses within the Heggs…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. Daniels v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. George v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. Baxter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  5. Gibson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API