Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Sergeant ERIC F. KELLY

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided July 5, 2017No. ARMY 20150725Published

1Concurrence

Senior Judge CAMPANELLA,

concurring in the judgment,

joined by Judge CELTNIEKS, Judge PENLAND, and Judge BURTON:

The majority reads the recent amendment to Article 56, UCMJ, too broadly, and this reading results in construing the court’s Article 66, UCMJ, authority too narrowly. While the ultimate judgment of not providing relief for sentence appropriateness is sound in this case, the foundation upon which the majority judgment is based is flawed.

In concluding this court has no power to examine the sentence appropriateness of a trial court’s issuance of a mandatory dishonorable discharge, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. ColeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. ClaxtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  3. United States v. NeradUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API