Lawrence v. Cannavan
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action for an accounting and for the recovery of the sum found due thereon, brought to the Court of Common Pleas in New Haven County and tried to the court, Hubbard, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff, and appeal by the defendant, upon the ground that the judgment was rendered after the time allowed therefor by statute had expired.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This action was brought to the January term, 1897, of the Court of Common Pleas for New Haven county, terms of which are required by statute to be held on the first Mondays of January, March, May and November, and on the third Monday of September.
The judgment file, dated July 23d, 1903, states that the case came by legal continuances to that time, when the par ties appeared and were fully heard, and judgment was rendered for the plaintiff for $538.90 and costs.
In the finding the following facts appear: The evidence in the case was heard by the court (Hubbard, J.') on the 8th and 9th of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ex parte BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Sturdevant v. StantonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
- State v. HartleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- Jaques v. Bridgeport Horse-RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
3Cited by19 opinions
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. CostleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Ferguson v. SaboSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Borden v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Waterman v. United Caribbean, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Cheshire Brass Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.