Legal Opinion

United States v. Matson Nav. Co. The Louie III

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 19, 1953No. 12902_1PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

A unique body of law particularly appropriate to the regulation and settlement of the special problems arising out of sea navigation and commerce has been developed for the “men who go down to the sea in ships” and for the merchants who use the waterways of the world as highways. The maritime law has grown from ancient times to the present day, changing with changing times to meet the objective of .common justice. Landlubber courts, nurtured in the common law of their several countries, early conceded litigation relating to the sea to a specialty court commonly called…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. The LottawannaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. The Propeller Genesee Chief v. FitzhughSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  5. The PlymouthSupreme Court of the United States · 1866

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Rodrigue v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation v. Empresa Naviera Santa S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. Pittston Stevedoring Corp. v. DellaventuraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API