Steele v. Shuler
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.
This is a boundary dispute involving a line which is the north line of plaintiffs’ property, the south line of defendants’ property, which adjoins the Steeles’ on the north. The area involved in the dispute constitutes a frontage along a county road of approximately 58 feet, with a depth of 440 feet more or less. The trial court quieted the title of plaintiffs Steele, denying the claims of the Shulers expressed in a cross-complaint. The Shulers appeal and urge an insufficiency of evidence to support the court’s finding. Appellants’ contention centers upon a blazed tree which, it is asserted,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bernhard v. WallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Loustalot v. McKeelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Board of Trustees v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Nebel v. GuyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Pedersen v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Berry v. SbragiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Dooley's Hardware Mart v. TriggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969