Legal Opinion

Wadkins v. Hill

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1886No. 12,524PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Eush Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The complaint of the appellants alleges-ownership of land, and prays that the title may be quieted. The first paragraph of the appellee’s cross complaint sets forth facts showing that an instrument executed by the appellants, although in form a deed, was in fact a mortgage, and asks that it may be foreclosed as a mortgage. There can be no doubt that the theory upon which this pleading is con*544rstructed is that the instrument is a mortgage, ^nd unless it is ¡good upon this theory the court erred in overruling appellants’ demurrer. It is settled law that a pleading must be •good on the theory on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mescall v. TullyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. BillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Campbell v. RouttIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Sidener v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Anderson v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Old v. MohlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Spencer v. McGonagleIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Isgrigg v. SchooleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Frankel v. Michigan Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Ohio Thresher & Engine Co. v. HenselIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API