Legal Opinion

Continental National Bank v. Reynolds

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 3, 1936No. Gen. No. 38,252PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Friend

After plaintiff had obtained judgment by confession on a mortgage note, defendants, on petition, were granted leave to appear and defend and later filed a verified answer. Trial was had before the court without a jury, resulting in findings and judgment in favor of defendants, and an order was entered vacating and setting aside the judgment by confession and dismissing the suit at plaintiff’s costs. This appeal followed.

The essential facts are undisputed. It appears from the record that May 24, 1920, defendants executed a mortgage note for $14,000, due three years thereafter and containing*…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Stevens v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Bonart v. RabitoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  3. West Chicago Park Commissioners v. McMullenIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  4. State Nat. Bank of Ft. Worth v. VickeryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1918
  5. People ex rel. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. VanCleaveIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kent v. RhombergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  2. Brosius v. MadsenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API